Bendradarbiaujame su
Grįžti atgal

U.s. Treasury Repurchase Agreement

Deposits with a specified maturity date (usually the next day or the following week) are long-term repurchase contracts. A trader sells securities to a counterparty with the agreement that he will buy them back at a higher price at a given time. In this agreement, the counterparty receives the use of the securities for the duration of the transaction and receives interest that is indicated as the difference between the initial selling price and the purchase price. The interest rate is set and interest is paid at maturity by the trader. A Repo term is used to invest cash or to finance assets when the parties know how long it will take them. While conventional deposits are generally credit risk tumelas, there are residual credit risks. Although this is essentially a guaranteed transaction, the seller may not buy back the securities sold on the due date. In other words, the pension seller does not fulfill his obligation. Therefore, the buyer can keep the warranty and liquidate the guarantee to recover the borrowed money. However, security may have lost value since the beginning of the operation, as security is subject to market movements. To reduce this risk, deposits are often over-insured and subject to a daily market margin (i.e., if the guarantee ends in value, a margin call may be triggered to ask the borrower to reserve additional securities). Conversely, if the value of the guarantee increases, there is a credit risk to the borrower, since the lender is not allowed to resell it.

If this is considered a risk, the borrower can negotiate a subsecured repot. [6] The pension market is one of the largest and most active sectors in the short-term credit markets and is an important source of liquidity for money funds and institutional investors. Pension transactions (also known as resean agreements) are short-term secured loans, often obtained by traders (borrowers) to finance their securities portfolios and by institutional investors (lenders), such as money funds and securities lenders, as sources of secured investments. In 2008, attention was drawn to a form known as Repo 105 after the Collapse of Lehman, since Repo 105s would have been used as an accounting ploy to mask the deterioration of Lehman`s financial health. Another controversial form of buyback order is the „internal repo,“ which was first highlighted in 2005. In 2011, it was proposed that, in order to finance risky transactions on European government bonds, Rest could have been the mechanism by which MF Global endangered several hundred million dollars of client funds before its bankruptcy in October 2011.